The Next Big Idea cover image

GOING INFINITE: Michael Lewis Wants to Change Your Mind About Sam Bankman-Fried

The Next Big Idea

Probabilities Are Not Certainties. Different from radical intuitive judgment

1min Snip

00:00
Play full episode
Probabilistic thinking can be misleading when individuals assign specific probabilities to uncertain events without an accurate basis for those numbers. This reliance on arbitrary figures often leads to overconfidence in those judgments, as it creates a false sense of precision where none exists. Such overconfidence is problematic because it obscures the inherent uncertainties of a situation, revealing that what is presented as probabilistic reasoning may actually be a cover for radical intuitive judgment. This disconnect indicates that the quality of judgment is diminished when individuals mistake subjective assessments for objective probabilities, ultimately resulting in flawed decision-making.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode