The issue of incentives in wealth accumulation is not solely driven by material gain. People have intrinsic motivation and often engage in activities for causes or societal good. The mainstream view in economics that people are solely incentivized by material gains is inaccurate. Limits to wealth accumulation should be defended to find an equilibrium that minimizes harm from wealth concentration while still allowing for incentives. Some individuals, even with high incomes, state that they would work the same even with less earnings. The argument that high rewards are needed to motivate individuals to take risks for societal benefits is sometimes misused by those solely seeking personal gain.
Taylor Swift achieved her billionaire status because of her talent, work ethic, and support from her fans. But some question whether any individual should be able to accumulate so much wealth. Those arguing they should point to philosopher Robert Nozick, who says if someone acquires wealth through just means, they are entitled to it. Those arguing “no” say that luck and systemic advantages often play a role, sometimes involving exploitation, and that billionaires have an outsized influence on policy. Now we debate: Does Taylor Swift Deserve Her Billion Dollar Fortune?
Arguing Yes: Jessica Flanigan, Political Philosopher and Chair in Ethics and Democratic Values at the University of Richmond
Arguing No: Ingrid Robeyns, Chair in Ethics of Institutions at Utrecht University's Ethics Institute; Author of "Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth"
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices