The core of the legal case in AI copyright infringement revolves around the need to prove that copyrighted music was used to train AI models. While the companies claim their models generate new works, the argument asserts that machines copy, while humans create. Unique human creativity, experiences, and inspiration set humans apart from machine learning algorithms, which rely on patterns and predictive models. The lawsuit contends that hiding inputs and claiming transformative use doesn't absolve from proving copying. The legal argument refutes the idea that machine learning is akin to human creativity by emphasizing the distinct nature of human creation and the limitations of AI in truly innovating.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode