AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Episode 2455 CWSA 04/25/24
Real Coffee with Scott Adams
Criminal Behavior Interpretation
1min Snip
00:00
Summary
Transcript
Episode notes
The speaker suggests that despite Trump's belief that the election was rigged and advice from his lawyers, the lawyers' disbarment and punishment indicate a belief in their actions. The mention of ambiguity in law, the unconventional legal definitions used, and the past precedents of similar actions, question the criminality of the situation. The core issue revolves around Trump's potential immunity as president for acts that, according to the speaker, weren't crimes. The statement concludes with a strong affirmative stance that the identified individual, Jack Smith, should be in jail for this alleged criminal behavior without doubt.
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode