AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Exploring the Oral Arguments and Justices' Skepticism on Trump's Eligibility
The oral arguments on Trump's eligibility seemed to conclude quickly, hinting that the justices might have already made up their minds. Both conservative and liberal justices appeared skeptical about removing Trump from the ballot. Trump's lawyer, Jonathan Mitchell, presented various arguments, but they didn't gain much traction with the court. The idea that Trump is not an officer of the United States under the 14th Amendment was not favored by the justices, who seemed to coalesce around different points.