Liquor licensing laws originated from the need to control unruly behavior among troops after the War of the Roses, aiming to regulate taverns that served alcohol. Historically, in Australia, licenses could only be revoked upon death occurring on the premises. Over the past few decades, a strong connection has been established between alcohol consumption and several adverse health effects, including its classification as a human carcinogen. However, research from the 1970s introduced a counter-narrative suggesting that moderate alcohol consumption, specifically around one to two drinks per day, may confer health benefits, encapsulated in the concept known as the J-curve, which correlated moderate drinking with lower mortality rates across diverse studies.
For the regular drinker it is a source of great comfort: the fat pile of studies that say a daily tipple is better for a longer life than avoiding alcohol completely. But a new analysis challenges that thinking and says it was based on flawed research that compares drinkers with people who are sick and sober. Madeleine Finlay hears from the study’s lead author, Tim Stockwell, a scientist at the Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research at the University of Victoria, to find out why scientists (including him) were so convinced, and what the actual risks of alcohol are. Help support our independent journalism at
theguardian.com/sciencepod