**Three Lenses of how humans make Meaning: Causal, Temporal and Intuitive **

Human meaning-making can be understood through three distinct frameworks: causality, temporality, and synchronicity. Causality, the dominant approach in Western thought, emphasizes a linear relationship where events are connected through direct causes, leading to a challenge in identifying an ultimate origin for any sequence of events. This framework proves essential for scientific and medical advancements but can become cumbersome when addressing the chain of causation without an endpoint. Temporality reflects the simultaneous occurrence of events, which often complicates the creation of coherent meaning. Lastly, synchronicity embodies the idea that seemingly unrelated factors may converge to create a shared significance, often eliciting an emotional response. This perspective prompts a more instinctive and ritualistic engagement, such as with tarot, contrasting with the structured, causal methodologies. In essence, while causality structures our understanding of events, temporality and synchronicity invite a deeper exploration of meaning beyond linear reasoning.