Fact-checking should be consistent and thorough for all parties involved in a debate. Instances of selective fact-checking undermine credibility, as seen when one side's claims go unchecked while the other's are corrected in real time. Factual inaccuracies, such as misattributions or exaggerations about statements and intentions, can lead to misleading narratives. Clarifying the context of comments is crucial to avoid conflating economic discussions with violent implications. Additionally, attributing blame for complex situations, such as military withdrawals, should be approached with care to avoid oversimplification.
God's Debris: The Complete Works, Amazon https://tinyurl.com/GodsDebrisCompleteWorks
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
Politics, Inflation, Pre-Election Economy, Taylor Swift Endorsement Cost, Elon Musk Humor, 3-On-1 Presidential Debate, President Trump, VP Harris, Presidential Debate Lies, CNN Daniel Dale's Lie, Harris Hoax Usage, Kamala Wifi Earring Rumor, David Muir Bias Fact-Checking, Post-Birth Abortion, Nightly News Warning Label, Scott Adams
---
Support this podcast:
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support