Question Evidence, Not Tradition

The reliability of religious texts and figures hinges on the evaluation of historical evidence rather than the acceptance of faith-based claims. While certain apocryphal writings are dismissed for lacking eyewitness testimony, foundational texts like Paul's epistles similarly lack such validation, prompting a critical examination of their authenticity. Moreover, claims about prophetic roles or miraculous events, such as Christ's resurrection, must be scrutinized through tangible evidence rather than blind belief. The call for concrete proof underscores a tension between traditional faith and empirical verification, emphasizing that faith should be supported by documented historical data.