The concept of intellectual humility emphasizes the importance of acknowledging the possibility of being wrong and being open to considering alternative viewpoints. Often, those who question established experts are not skeptical of the new sources they turn to, failing to maintain a balanced approach. Engaging in rigorous debates and disagreements within established expertise communities is different from blindly accepting any contradictory idea without sufficient evidence. Blindly rejecting established expertise can lead to overlooking critical insights and expertise, as demonstrated by the UK home office case where officials falsely accused Sri Lankan refugees of inflicting scars on themselves for asylum purposes. This case highlights the danger of creating a scrutiny-free catch-all bucket for implausible theories when all other possibilities are disregarded, emphasizing the importance of intellectual humility and critical thinking in evaluating information.