Distinguishing Investigative Pieces from Conspiracy Theories

1min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

The snippet discusses the blurred lines between investigative pieces revealing sinister intents by a small group of people and conspiracy theories. It highlights the example of a book where the narrative feels like a conspiracy theory due to emphasizing an individual with evil intent behind major decisions. The speaker ponders on reconciling genuine investigative journalism with far-fetched conspiracy theories and questions the difference between the two.

This is the fifth official episode, breaking down the 1974 Pulitzer Prize winning book, The Power Broker by our hero Robert Caro.

This week, Roman and Elliott also sit down with Brandy Zadrozny, a senior reporter for NBC News who covers misinformation, conspiracy theories, and the internet. Brandy recently finished The Power Broker, and she’s got a great perspective on what the book says about the press and its relationship to power, what has changed in journalism, and what has remained the same.

On today’s show, Elliott Kalan and Roman Mars will cover the last section of Part 4 of the book (Chapter 21 through Chapter 24), discussing the major story beats and themes.

The Power Broker #5: Brandy Zadrozny

Join the discussion on Discord and our Subreddit.

Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ on Apple Podcasts to listen to ad-free new episodes and get exclusive access to bonus content.