The concept of happiness in a capitalist society often clashes with the reality of widespread suffering, as evidenced by high depression rates globally. This raises questions about the pursuit of happiness, especially in dire circumstances such as poverty or grief. Suggesting that individuals should find happiness in adverse conditions may be misguided. Instead, embracing mixed emotions like wonder or awe could provide a more realistic and fulfilling emotional experience. Furthermore, capitalism contributes to a consumer culture focused on instant gratification, which may undermine deeper values such as virtue and excellence. Ultimately, pursuing a life that aligns with reason and connection to a greater harmony may be more meaningful than the traditional pursuit of happiness.
Happiness is a complex emotion and mental state that can be achieved through virtue or pleasure. But should it be for the good of the individual or society? Those in favor of virtue point to the Stoics and the Founding Fathers, saying you should strive for a life of moral virtue and rationality. Those in favor of pleasure say everyone should be able to experience it and define their sources of happiness. Now we debate: The Pursuit of Happiness: Virtue or Pleasure?
Arguing Virtue: Jeffrey Rosen, CEO & President of the National Constitution Center; Author of “The Pursuit of Happiness: How Classical Writers on Virtue Inspired the Lives of the Founders and Defined America”
Arguing Pleasure: Roger Crisp, Professor of Moral Philosophy at the University of Oxford; Uehiro Fellow and Tutor in Philosophy at St. Anne's College, Oxford
Nayeema Raza, Journalist at New York Magazine and Vox, is the guest moderator.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices