There is a clear dissonance between the rhetoric of acceptance promoted by wealthy individuals and their actual practices. While public figures advocate for compassion towards migrants and social justice, they often reside in affluent neighborhoods that remain untouched by the issues they claim to support. Events like the transportation of migrants to exclusive areas highlight a hypocrisy where advocacy does not translate into personal sacrifice or real involvement. This contradiction underscores a broader critique of elite attitudes towards societal crises, revealing a tendency to preach values of inclusiveness while simultaneously enjoying the privileges of wealth that shield them from the consequences of the very issues they discuss.