The case presents a complex legal theory where a state-level misdemeanor charge is combined with an ambiguous federal charge. The state prosecutor attempted to use a federal election charge as a means to prosecute the state underlying felony, which raises questions about jurisdiction. While state prosecutors are not prohibited from doing so, it appears inappropriate when federal officials have not pursued the federal charge. Additionally, the case involved charging the former president with books and records offenses linked to another statute in New York. The prosecution kept the defense in the dark about the specifics of the alleged offense until late in the trial, potentially depriving the defense of due process rights. This lack of proper notice and opportunity to respond may form a basis for a due process claim by Trump's lawyers.