Goldberg's perspective on Iran's nuclear program, characterized by alarmism and fear-mongering, was heavily criticized for being based on unreliable sources and exaggeration. Despite his claims of Iran's imminent nuclear capability, his predictions based on 'Israeli policy makers' and 'Western intelligence agencies' were viewed as unsubstantiated and driven by a biased narrative. The portrayal of Iranian leaders as aggressive and expansionist, coupled with suggestions of preemptive military strikes by Israel or the US, was deemed speculative and lacking factual basis. Goldberg's advocacy for military action against Iran was interpreted as baseless fear-inducing tactics rather than a legitimate concern grounded in reality.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode