Examining Campus Responses to Anti-Semitism: Harvard vs. MIT

The district court's decision to allow the case against Harvard regarding the maintenance of an anti-Semitic environment indicates sufficient evidence to proceed, contrasting sharply with MIT's situation. Despite similar instances of anti-Semitic behavior on MIT's campus, the institution demonstrated a proactive approach by making efforts to address and prevent such actions. This contrasts with Harvard's indecisive and contradictory responses, which included allowing a vigil for martyrs in a space that was recently designated for limited academic activities. The critical aspect lies in the legal standard of 'deliberate indifference' under Title VI. MIT's attempts, despite their shortcomings, highlight an effort to respond to incidents of anti-Semitism, while Harvard's lack of decisive action raises serious concerns about its handling of the issue. This evolving situation is poised to escalate, particularly in light of external circumstances, emphasizing the need for further examination of both institutions' policies and responses to anti-Semitism on campus.