Exploring Legal Procedures and Interpretations in a Democratic Society

Legal procedures and interpretations in a democratic society are fundamental in upholding the rule of law and the constitution. It is crucial to follow the correct procedures, whether an action stems from Congress or an agency, even if the outcome seems favorable. Justice Scalia's insight emphasizes that the interpretation of law should sometimes lead to outcomes one may not prefer, highlighting the importance of impartial interpretation. Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Thomas's contrasting opinions reveal the debate between legal reasoning and consequentialist results. Justice Thomas emphasizes that decisions should not be based on desired outcomes but on legal analysis, to maintain the balance of power between the government and the people. While agencies may propose beneficial ideas, they must have the legal authority, established through due process, to execute them. Taking unilateral actions, such as using executive authority to bypass legal procedures, can undermine the democratic process and lead to substantial consequences, demonstrating the necessity of upholding legal frameworks in a democratic society.