The Phantom Time Hypothesis is a theory suggesting that the Holy Roman Emperor and the Pope conspired to change the calendar by advancing it by 300 years to be in power in the year 1000. This fringe theory claims that we are actually in the 1700s, not 2024, which has been debunked. The speaker suggests that less harmful conspiracy theories could divert people from dangerous ones, like convincing individuals that we are truly in the 1700s. This approach is seen as a milder way to address conspiracy theories, providing an alternative that is less harmful and divisive.
This week, an assassination attempt for the social media age: what the platforms got right and wrong in the chaotic aftermath. Then we talk with the Times reporter Teddy Schleifer from this week’s Republican National Convention in Milwaukee about the wave of Silicon Valley billionaires stepping up to back Trump. And finally, we talk to The Times’s Styles reporter Callie Holtermann about facial fitness gum, a “jawmaxxing” product targeted at teen boys online.
Guests:
Additional Reading:
We want to hear from you. Email us at hardfork@nytimes.com. Find “Hard Fork” on YouTube and TikTok.