The interpretation of statements can vary significantly based on personal perspectives. A person's understanding of sarcasm or intent behind words may differ from another’s, leading to conflicting views on the same statement. Fact-checking based on assumed internal thoughts rather than explicit communication undermines the purpose of fact-checking. It's crucial to recognize that one’s opinion of another's mindset is subjective and cannot serve as a definitive fact-check. Assessing the transparency of spoken words is vital while acknowledging that interpretations are influenced by individual biases.
God's Debris: The Complete Works, Amazon https://tinyurl.com/GodsDebrisCompleteWorks
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
Politics, Inflation, Pre-Election Economy, Taylor Swift Endorsement Cost, Elon Musk Humor, 3-On-1 Presidential Debate, President Trump, VP Harris, Presidential Debate Lies, CNN Daniel Dale's Lie, Harris Hoax Usage, Kamala Wifi Earring Rumor, David Muir Bias Fact-Checking, Post-Birth Abortion, Nightly News Warning Label, Scott Adams
---
Support this podcast:
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support