The Emergence of Reason as a Means of Justification and Accurate Judgment

1min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Key takeaways

Transcript

Episode notes

Judging people without access to their minds is difficult and can lead to misunderstandings.
The ability to justify our actions and intentions is important in cooperation and accurate judgement.
Reasoning emerged as a result of the pressure to justify ourselves.
Constant self-justification is a normal part of everyday life.

Here at the Mindscape Podcast, we are firmly pro-reason. But what does that mean, fundamentally and in practice? How did humanity come into the idea of not just doing things, but doing things for reasons? In this episode we talk with cognitive scientist Hugo Mercier about these issues. He is the co-author (with Dan Sperber) of The Enigma of Reason, about how the notion of reason came to be, and more recently author of Not Born Yesterday, about who we trust and what we believe. He argues that our main shortcoming is not being insufficiently skeptical of radical claims, but of being too skeptical of claims that don't fit our views.

Support Mindscape on Patreon.

Hugo Mercier received a Ph.D. in cognitive sciences from the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales. He is currently a Permanent CNRS Research Scientist at the Institut Jean Nicod, Paris. Among his awards are the Prime d’excellence from the CNRS.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.