The 'superstar effect' in economics explains how individuals like Taylor Swift can become billionaires due to their global popularity and being consumers' first choice in the market. This phenomenon occurs because a larger market size amplifies the superstar effect, making top performers like Taylor Swift highly rewarded for their talents in a worldwide market. Therefore, her massive comparative advantage over competitors stems from being the preferred option for millions of consumers worldwide, leading to her substantial economic success.
Taylor Swift achieved her billionaire status because of her talent, work ethic, and support from her fans. But some question whether any individual should be able to accumulate so much wealth. Those arguing they should point to philosopher Robert Nozick, who says if someone acquires wealth through just means, they are entitled to it. Those arguing “no” say that luck and systemic advantages often play a role, sometimes involving exploitation, and that billionaires have an outsized influence on policy. Now we debate: Does Taylor Swift Deserve Her Billion Dollar Fortune?
Arguing Yes: Jessica Flanigan, Political Philosopher and Chair in Ethics and Democratic Values at the University of Richmond
Arguing No: Ingrid Robeyns, Chair in Ethics of Institutions at Utrecht University's Ethics Institute; Author of "Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth"
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices