AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Engagement through Personal Narratives
Jurors tend to rely on narratives to make sense of complex, disorganized information presented during trials. This reliance stems from their need to weave personal stories that align with the inputs they receive. Jurors effectively filter facts through personal biases, creating a mental narrative that they then compare to the stories from both prosecution and defense. They ultimately choose the story that resonates most with their own experiences and beliefs. This phenomenon underscores a broader psychological tendency where individuals insert themselves into stories, enhancing engagement. Stories evoke emotional responses and facilitate understanding in a way that raw data and statistics cannot, as they resonate with our innate narcissistic tendencies.