Seeking Synthesis in Christian Theology

1min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

The approach of dissecting Christianity and favoring one aspect over the other is seen as a flawed method in the conversation. The speaker highlights the danger in selectively interpreting religious texts and ascribes it to historical heresies. The Orthodox Christian perspective emphasizes the importance of seeking a synthesis and harmony between seemingly contradictory elements in the Old and New Testaments.

Last year, Tyler asked his readers “What Is the Strongest Argument for the Existence of God?” and followed up a few days later with a post outlining why he doesn’t believe in God. New York Times columnist Ross Douthat accepted the implicit challenge, responding to the second post in dialogic form and arguing that theism warrants further consideration.

This in-person dialogue starts along similar lines, covering Douthat’s views on religion and theology, but then moves on to more earth-bound concerns, such as his stance on cats, The Wire vs The Sopranos, why Watership Down is the best modern novel for understanding politics, eating tofu before it was cool, journalism as a trade, why he’s open to weird ideas, the importance of Sam’s Club Republicans, the specter of a Buterlian Jihad, and more.

Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links.

Recorded January 11th, 2018 Other ways to connect

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram
Follow Tyler on Twitter
Follow Ross on Twitter
Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu
Subscribe at our newsletter page to have the latest Conversations with Tyler news sent straight to your inbox.