The Moral Law and the Case Against Atheism

Moral laws cannot exist by accident; they imply a commander or designer who instills moral commands into existence. The presence of a moral lawgiver lends purpose and seriousness to moral breaches, as breaking the moral law is not merely an infraction but an offense against an authority. This raises profound implications for atheism, as atheists must reconcile the existence of moral laws, the universe's origin, and the emergence of life, all of which pose philosophical and scientific challenges. The assertion that morals emerged by chance contradicts their apparent order and importance. Moreover, atheism requires beliefs that are perceived as absurd or counterintuitive, forcing atheists to claim that complex phenomena arise from randomness. The reluctance to accept a higher power often stems from the moral implications and obligations associated with that belief, leading individuals to reject the existence of God due to the demands it places on their lives, rather than out of pure rational thought. The rejection of God is thus entwined with a desire for autonomy and a hesitance to submit to moral authority.