Dacon, Can You Talk About Ya?

Zosard wrote in being in nothingness, which he published before they were almost exact biographical contemporaries. Sart wrigts that toward the end, writes what he calls a existential psychoanalysis. I think that really rubbed lacon the wrong way, because he wanted to be the developer of exestential psychoanalysis. His con on of subjectivity is very close to sarts, i think. A, and i think he wished that he was sart, basically. But people identify lecon with the post sartrian generation. So kint of a break between.