Interpreting data involves understanding the perspectives and beliefs of the people involved, empathizing with their story and cultural context, and acknowledging that narratives shape rationality. While data and numbers are important, they are embedded in stories that give them meaning and significance. Rather than solely relying on data, it is crucial to engage in discussions and arguments about the different narratives at play to gain a comprehensive understanding of the situation.
In this episode, we chat with Jason Blakely, an associate professor of political science, discussing a range of topics related to political science, ideology, and the role of science in society. Jason critiques the approach of treating social sciences like natural sciences, highlighting the limitations and misinterpretations this can lead to. The discussion also delves into the concept of "Psi-ops" in social sciences, the influence of cultural and narrative elements in understanding social phenomena, and the distinction between natural and social sciences. The conversation critically examines the current ideological and cultural frameworks in society, emphasizing the importance of storytelling and interpretation in understanding human behaviour and social dynamics.
Enjoy! x