The Internet Both Improved and Detracted from Productivity — So Might AI

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Comments

Transcript

Episode notes

The internet has had both a productivity enhancing effect and a productivity reducing effect. It has made people more productive by providing access to information and resources. However, it has also introduced distractions and reduced the ability to focus and reflect. The constant access to content and entertainment has increased distraction levels, leading to increased anger, annoyance, and tiredness. The ability to hold a train of thought has decreased and the time spent focusing on one thing has reduced. This has implications for the economy and scientific progress. Similarly, AI may have both positive and negative effects on productivity in the future.

Typically when we put out a call for audience questions, there’s no single topic that dominates. This time was different. The questions we received were overwhelmingly focused on artificial intelligence: Do A.I. systems pose an existential threat to humanity? Will robots take our jobs? How could these machines potentially make our lives — and the lives of our children — better?

So I asked the show’s senior editor, Roge Karma, to join me to talk through them. We also discuss my mixed feelings about the calls to “pause” A.I. development, why I’m less worried about rogue A.I. systems than the incentives of the companies and countries developing A.I., the need for a “public vision” for A.I. development, whether A.I. companions can help address widespread loneliness, why I’m skeptical that A.I. advances will lead to skyrocketing economic productivity, the possibility that A.I. advances will lead to a post-work utopia, why I think of A.I. less as a normal technology and more as a “hyper object,” what A.I. systems are unveiling about what it means to be human and more.

Mentioned:

“Natural Selection Favors AIs over Humans” by Dan Hendrycks

“2022 Expert Survey on Progress in AI”

God, Human, Animal, Machine by Meghan O’Gieblyn

“Resisting dehumanization in the age of A.I.” with Emily Bender

“The Moral Economy of High-Tech Modernism” by Henry Farrell and Marion Fourcade

Recommendations:

“Some of Us Are Brave” by Danielle Ponder

“In Memory of a Honeybee” by Felix Rösch

“Clouds” by Felix Rösch and Laura Masotto

“Driven” by Felix Rösch

Mabe Fratti

Trance Frendz by Ólafur Arnalds and Nils Frahm

Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast, and you can find Ezra on Twitter @ezraklein. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” is produced by Roge Karma, Kristin Lin and Jeff Geld. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris and Kate Sinclair. Mixing by Jeff Geld. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero and Kristina Samulewski.