The most straightforward method for conducting a presidential election mirrors that of gubernatorial or congressional elections: the candidate receiving the most votes should win. The current presidential election process, however, complicates this with independent state certification processes and potential lawsuits. The events of January 6, 2021, highlighted a critical certification crisis, where attempts were made to influence the certification of the election results, specifically targeting the role of the vice president. This maneuver, invoking the 12th Amendment, aimed to create a scenario where the election would fall to the House of Representatives, exploiting the voting structure that favors state delegation over individual votes. The political implications of this strategy hinged on controlling the majority of state delegations.
Republicans are already preparing to contest the result if Kamala Harris wins the presidency. American elections demand patience and trust, but with Donald Trump on the ballot those are in short supply. How ugly could this election get? And what will happen if the result is contested?
John Prideaux hosts with Charlotte Howard and Idrees Kahloon. They’re joined by former Georgia lieutenant governor Geoff Duncan and Congressman Jamie Raskin.
This episode uses audio from The Laska Archive titled “Kentucky representative Thurston Ballard Morton on investigation election fraud 08 0011”.
Runtime: 48 min
Transcripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.
For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.