In your book, you write that current conventional thinking among environmentalists is that we don't need nuclear power. How's that working out for us really? Well, ughe but let's say i want to take the charitable view and i say we'll look solar, wind, other renewables are newer technologies so inevitably the price will fall and the efficiency will increase. We know that's the path. The price of wind and solar has come down a lot, and they're very cheap now when they produce.
Liberals endorse harm reduction when it comes to the opioid epidemic. Are they ready to take the same approach to climate change?