I'm borrowing from the thoughts and research of several other people smarter than me, but Carl Truman and Charles Taylor most specifically just wanted to give them credit here for intellectual honesty. So Truman argues this all began way before the sexual revolution with a much more significant revolution of identity. And the first key development that had to take place was the internalizing of that identity. What does that mean? Historically, the answer to the question, who are you, was answered externally? I am the son of my parents. I am a member of this tribe. I am a farmer or whatever my trade may be. And of course, the most common answer historically is I am what my religion says I am. We define ourselves by external identity markers. But in the 18th century, the answer, who are you? Started turning inward. Truman specifically focuses on the philosophy of Rousseau. Now other philosophers take it back further ironically to the Protestant Reformation, which represented a revolutionary change in the way we view ourselves. We are now individuals and not helplessly beholden to institutional authority and power. And individualism is a good thing, but hyper-individualism gone awry is a dangerous thing. And Truman focuses on the hyper-individualism of Rousseau and his famous line, quote, man is born free and is everywhere in chains. The idea is that our truest self is a free, autonomous, self-determining individual, but that individualism has been chained by external realities. So he reframes these externals that used to define our identity as now a threat to our identity.