Democracies aggregate information about people's preferences through voting.
The 'median voter theorem' suggests that the median preference becomes policy.
This system allows people to choose between different policy options (e.g., high tax/high services vs. low tax/low services).
While not perfect, democratic information aggregation is seen as better than totalitarian systems.
Totalitarian leaders may implement unpopular policies due to lack of feedback, potentially leading to violent overthrows.
00:00
Transcript
Episode notes
What if the information anarchy of the internet spells the downfall of liberalism?
Economist Noah Smith and Ethereum Founder Vitalik Buterin join us for a fascinating discussion on why Authoritarianism might be the answer to the current information warfare. Yes, you heard that right.
We start the episode by defining liberalism, how it has brought excessive polarization and why totalitarianism might be the only solution left. We then steelman the case against this same argument and how blockchains and crypto could play a role in all this.
0:00 Intro 8:53 Defining Liberalism 21:50 Information Warfare 42:17 Summarizing the Argument 55:09 Could the Thesis be Wrong? 1:11:12 Information Leviathans 1:34:13 The Role of Blockchains 1:38:22 Closing & Disclaimers