Utilizing colloquial language, such as 'weird', can resonate more effectively with the public compared to formal rhetoric. Informal communication, exemplified by references to 'weird' in political discourse, creates a visceral connection that formal language may fail to achieve. The shift towards a more relatable vernacular reflects a broader Midwestern sensibility and highlights the need for politicians to adapt their messaging to ensure it resonates with people's feelings and experiences. The growing appeal of this kind of language may influence future political conversations.
Project 2025 and J.D. Vance have brought fringe policies to the presidential campaign. Democrats are using both to label the Republican ticket "weird." Shelby Talcott of Semafor and Eli Stokols from Politico explain how this messaging strikes voters.
This episode was produced by Victoria Chamberlin, edited by Amina Al-Sadi, fact-checked by Matt Collette and Laura Bullard, engineered by Patrick Boyd and Andrea Kristinsdottir, and hosted by Noel King.
Transcript at vox.com/today-explained-podcast
Support Today, Explained by becoming a Vox Member today: http://www.vox.com/members
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices