Third parties often experience localized success, particularly in state and local elections, yet structural factors inherent in the two-party system usually curtail their longevity. Historical examples illustrate that while third parties can momentarily influence political dynamics—such as the Green Party in California—they typically fade due to systemic limitations. The conversation reflects on the need for a functional political system that prioritizes citizen engagement, raising questions about whether a successful third party could coexist with or even replace one of the main parties. Additionally, historical caution against political parties from the founding fathers highlights concerns about entrenched factions, suggesting a desire for more fluid party dynamics rather than a rigid two-party monopoly.
While the two-party system has been the standard in the US government, third parties have often challenged this status quo and now advocates to be added to election ballots permanently. Those who agree say third parties offer non-partisan solutions and are more representative of ideologies, unlike the polarized partisanship present now. Those who disagree say the two-party system fosters stability and simplifies voting decisions. Now we debate: Does America Need A Third Party?
Arguing Yes: Andrew Yang, Founder of the Forward Party, Former Presidential Candidate
Arguing No: Daniel DiSalvo, Senior Fellow at Manhattan Institute; Political Science Professor at City College of New York–CUNY
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices