Understanding Free Speech: The Blob vs. Populism

Free speech is entangled in a larger conflict between what is termed 'the blob' and populism, rather than the conventional political divide of Democrats versus Republicans. 'The blob' refers to the entrenched foreign policy establishment, particularly within the U.S., U.K., and NATO, which has extensive influence over diplomacy, defense, and intelligence. This term originated from frustrations within the Obama administration regarding an omnipotent force in Washington, perceived to operate beyond the control of the White House. The blob extends its grip not only across governmental agencies like the State Department and CIA but also into the private sector, civil society, universities, and media. The establishment has played a crucial role since the end of World War II in maintaining a rules-based international order and exerting geopolitical influence without overt military conquest, relying instead on political strategies and covert operations, often referred to in historical contexts as 'dirty tricks.' While the blob is viewed as a problematic actor in issues of censorship and free expression, it is suggested that its existence is necessary for certain economic and diplomatic functions, such as ensuring access to resources critical to American interests. The dynamic relationship between this foreign policy apparatus and the broader political landscape illustrates the complexities behind free speech and its interaction with established power structures.