i tend to be sympathetic to the idea that there there are objective ethical truths i mean, there's various kinds of lines that get drawn here. And similarly, you shoul hof mentioned meta ethics. There was a kind of period in mid twentieth century moral philosophy where a lot of philosophers wanted to to do something, say something about ethics,. But they didn't really engage with the question how to live. They aned to separate the question of the nature of morality from practical questions about what what the ethical standards were. That sort of blurring of lines also applies to the kinds of questions about objectivity that you're raising. So on the one hand, there's a lot of moral
Sam Harris speaks to Kieran Setiya about the relevance of philosophy to living a good life. They discuss the existence of objective moral truths, being happy vs living well, our response to grief, the difference between "telic" and "atelic" activities, the power of reframing, FOMO, bias toward the future, regret, the asymmetry between pain and pleasure, and other topics.
If the Making Sense podcast logo in your player is BLACK, you can SUBSCRIBE to gain access to all full-length episodes at samharris.org/subscribe.
Learning how to train your mind is the single greatest investment you can make in life. That’s why Sam Harris created the Waking Up app. From rational mindfulness practice to lessons on some of life’s most important topics, join Sam as he demystifies the practice of meditation and explores the theory behind it.