Emotions play a significant role in shaping our morality, influencing our beliefs based on our inclinations. The author suggests that random selection of schools to go phone-free may offer insights into the effectiveness of such policies. The current focus on phone restrictions in schools differs from past moral panics, as most people have witnessed the impact firsthand. While traditional moral panics often stem from exaggerated media narratives, the issue of phone use in schools is widely acknowledged by parents and media as a genuine concern. The debate around phone restrictions in schools is less about scientific evidence and more about personal experiences and beliefs, leading to less opposition from critics. The author asserts that emotions often precede rational reasoning in shaping moral judgments, contributing to the polarization of viewpoints, especially in emotionally charged debates.