Imperfect Epistemic Grounds for Choosing Scientific Theories

1min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

The kinds of questions about scientific theories are generally decided using three broad types of epistemic grounds: common sense, scientific evidence, and theoretical elegance. However, these grounds are imperfect and involve trade-offs among them, as common sense is imperfect, scientific evidence may not always be directly obtainable, and theoretical elegance is subjective and inconclusive.

Scientists and philosophers sometimes advocate pretty outrageous-sounding ideas about the fundamental nature of reality. (Arguably I have been guilty of this.) It shouldn't be surprising that reality, in regimes far away from our everyday experience, fails to conform to common sense. But it's also okay to maintain a bit of skepticism in the face of bizarre claims. Philosopher Eric Schwitzgebel wants us to face up to the weirdness of the world. He claims that there are no non-weird ways to explain some of the most important features of reality, from quantum mechanics to consciousness.

Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/01/15/262-eric-schwitzgebel-on-the-weirdness-of-the-world/

Support Mindscape on Patreon.

Eric Schwitzgebel received his Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of California, Berkeley. He is currently a professor of philosophy at the University of California, Riverside. He is the author of several books, including the new The Weirdness of the World.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.