The speaker points out that everything they were taught about history, news, and science was wrong. They emphasize that all news, history, and scientific studies are fake to some extent and driven by money or bias. The speaker highlights that making decisions based on known fake history or science would be absurd. They suggest that those who realize the fakeness of these domains might not have mental problems, unlike those who still believe in their authenticity. The speaker questions the authenticity of elections and implies that control might influence election outcomes. They contrast the mental distress of those who believe in the authenticity of news, history, and science with those who understand their fake nature, suggesting that it is easier to comprehend the world when knowing the fabricated nature of these aspects.