Navigating Emotions: The Tension Between Stoicism and Existentialism

Stoicism, while popular and often perceived as a solution for emotional turmoil, can be seen as inadequate in promoting societal change. This philosophy, rooted in the concept of controlling emotions, may discourage feelings like anger, which are crucial for driving transformation. Instead, existentialist thought offers a more empowering perspective, acknowledging the importance of emotions as catalysts for change. Stoicism’s approach could lead to a sense of defeatism, particularly for those seeking to challenge the status quo. Emphasizing the internal work Stoicism promotes can offer value in unchangeable situations, yet the framework's insistence on emotional suppression can hinder personal and societal progress. Anger should not be dismissed but explored, as it often motivates action and change. In contrast to Stoic teachings, existentialist thinkers encourage a deeper curiosity about our emotions, fostering a more optimistic outlook towards potential change.