don't need to read the whole thing. What I want to read are the sections that are relevant to the Apollo 13 fire. And so I just went to notebook and said, tell me what I should read, you know, and it was like, you should start here. You should read there and I can click immediately in there and read through that. And so, to me, I'm using it as a way of accelerating the process of discovery that would just have been painful to do before, but I'm making just as many unplanned, serendipitous discoveries along the way. I mean, I think the criticism is like, well, if the model serves it up to you so quickly, even if you end up writing the book, you've missed the surprising thing that you would have never found. You would have only found it by reading through it in an incredibly linear way. And I think that that's just, it's just not true. Like I, it's constantly surfacing things that I hadn't thought of and making connections that I hadn't thought of. And so it's helping me understand the material more deeply where it gets complicated. And you and I've talked about this before. The way I think about it is it's a tool that helps you understand things. If you are genuinely interested in understanding things and having that understanding be in your brain, it's a huge net positive. 100%. Like if you go into it with good intentions, it is an amazing tool for thought.