The main disagreement between EA and EAC, particularly in long-termism, lies in the role of government. While EAC individuals advocate for minimal state intervention, EA long-termists recognize the need for government regulation in technologies that pose unprecedented risks to humanity and the future. This shift in thinking emphasizes the importance of mitigating existential risks as a global public good that the market cannot effectively address, leading to the conclusion that state intervention is crucial in regulating industries to prevent existential catastrophes in the future.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode