Intuitions and Consequences of AI Advancement

1min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Key takeaways

Transcript

Episode notes

As we approach human-level systems, there may be intermediate events or consequences such as deaths or wars that could prompt action.
Some individuals may anticipate government or researchers stepping in to address these concerns.
Hoping for disasters or actively trying to cause accidents in the name of safety is considered sociopathic and morally unethical.
The specific signal that would trigger action is unclear.

Read the full transcript here.

Does AI pose a near-term existential risk? Why might existential risks from AI manifest sooner rather than later? Can't we just turn off any AI that gets out of control? Exactly how much do we understand about what's going on inside neural networks? What is AutoGPT? How feasible is it to build an AI system that's exactly as intelligent as a human but no smarter? What is the "CoEm" AI safety proposal? What steps can the average person take to help mitigate risks from AI?

Connor Leahy is CEO and co-founder of Conjecture, an AI alignment company focused on making AI systems boundable and corrigible. Connor founded and led EleutherAI, the largest online community dedicated to LLMs, which acted as a gateway for people interested in ML to upskill and learn about alignment. With capabilities increasing at breakneck speed, and our ability to control AI systems lagging far behind, Connor moved on from the volunteer, open-source Eleuther model to a full-time, closed-source model working to solve alignment via Conjecture.

Staff