The key issue in academia today is the suppression of diverse viewpoints, leading to a lack of a free market of ideas. This stifling environment can prevent the exploration and publication of alternative perspectives, which is detrimental to intellectual growth. Moreover, common misconceptions about income statistics often arise from a failure to consider turnover among high earners. For instance, the claim of a stable top income bracket is misleading, as tracking these individuals over time reveals a dynamic group rather than a fixed elite. Recognizing the fluidity of income distribution challenges prevailing notions about wealth and underscores the importance of a variety of viewpoints in academic discourse.