AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
2min snip
SCOTUS hears Chevron doctrine argument.
Tangle
The Superiority of the Administrative State System
The debate around the Chevron doctrine highlights the argument that the administrative state should be responsive to the electorate by allowing new administrations to reverse course. This system enables voters to elect officials who can rule on ambiguities in law instead of relying solely on unelected judges. While there are concerns about potential inconsistencies, the idea that judges, Congress members, and presidents might not always be the best arbiters of policy implementation is appreciated. The discussion also touches on the political nature of judicial decisions and the shifting perspectives on Chevron based on the interests it serves. Despite the uncertainty, there is a belief that limiting or overturning Chevron could lead to curbing administrative overreach and promoting stability in the law.
00:00
Transcript
Episode notes
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode