The structure of an irrevocable trust offers tax benefits and asset growth by relinquishing control. A loophole may exist if control can be shifted from multiple parties to one based on the claim that it serves the trust’s best economic interests. This presents a challenge to justify such a change to a judge, particularly if the argument hinges on political ideology rather than clear economic advantages. Convincing a judge of the superior fiduciary capability of one party over others can be complex, especially in a context where siblings assert equal business acumen. Ultimately, the interplay of personal control preferences, political beliefs, and fiduciary responsibilities significantly impacts asset management strategies within irrevocable trusts.
Kara and Scott discuss the court battle over Rupert Murdoch's empire set to get underway this week. Then, Google and the DOJ are facing off for another major trial, this time Google is facing antitrust claims about its ad business. Plus, predictions on the presidential debate. Finally, our Friends of Pivot are sports icons, Sue Bird and Megan Rapinoe, who are now offering expert analysis every week on their podcast, "A Touch More." Sue and Megan talk about how women's sports has become a booming business, the pros and cons of athletes using social media, and the importance of being politically engaged.
Check out Vox Media's "A Touch More: The Podcast" weekly on Wednesdays on YouTube, Apple, and Spotify.
Follow Megan at @mrapinoe and Sue at @sbird10.
Follow us on Instagram and Threads at @pivotpodcastofficial.
Follow us on TikTok at @pivotpodcast.
Send us your questions by calling us at 855-51-PIVOT, or at nymag.com/pivot.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices