Neil deGrasse Tyson's controversial statements on gender and science have stirred up annoyance and disagreement. Critics argue that as a man of science, Tyson should present facts without emotional bias. They believe that distinguishing between male and female biological makeup is essential for scientific arguments, especially in the realm of sports. The concern is that allowing biological males to compete as females could lead to unfair advantages, particularly in combat sports. Critics advocate for a more reasonable approach that respects transgender individuals while also recognizing the biological differences and potential unfairness in certain competitive settings.