Jurors tend to rely on narratives to make sense of complex, disorganized information presented during trials. This reliance stems from their need to weave personal stories that align with the inputs they receive. Jurors effectively filter facts through personal biases, creating a mental narrative that they then compare to the stories from both prosecution and defense. They ultimately choose the story that resonates most with their own experiences and beliefs. This phenomenon underscores a broader psychological tendency where individuals insert themselves into stories, enhancing engagement. Stories evoke emotional responses and facilitate understanding in a way that raw data and statistics cannot, as they resonate with our innate narcissistic tendencies.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode