Dynamic Clarity: The Crutch of Static Typing

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Working solo often leads to a preference for dynamic languages, as collaboration typically highlights the need for good design and documentation over static typing. Static typing can sometimes mask poor design, allowing developers to neglect proper documentation and intuitive naming conventions. In reality, the benefits of static typing often stem from the compiler's ability to catch errors, which can also be achieved through advanced type inference in dynamically typed languages. This suggests that effective code practices are more crucial than the typing paradigm itself, emphasizing that clarity and understanding in code should take precedence over reliance on static types.

Jerod is back with another “It Depends” episode! This time he’s joined by Kris Brandow from Go Time and they’re talking all things API design. What makes a good API? Is GraphQL a solid choice? Why do we do REST wrong? And WTF does HATEOAS mean, anyway?

Leave us a comment

Changelog++ members save 10 minutes on this episode because they made the ads disappear. Join today!

Sponsors:

Neon – The fully managed serverless Postgres with a generous free tier. We separate storage and compute to offer autoscaling, branching, and bottomless storage.
Sentry – Get $100 towards your error monitoring with Sentry! Use the code changelog.
Fastly – Our bandwidth partner. Fastly powers fast, secure, and scalable digital experiences. Move beyond your content delivery network to their powerful edge cloud platform. Learn more at fastly.com
Fly.io – The home of Changelog.com — Deploy your apps and databases close to your users. In minutes you can run your Ruby, Go, Node, Deno, Python, or Elixir app (and databases!) all over the world. No ops required. Learn more at fly.io/changelog and check out the speedrun in their docs.