Ep. 220: Political violence and speech
So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast
Quotes from “Schneider v Phelps” 2017 and “Terminello v US” 1949
The Supreme Court in the Snyder v. Phelps case highlighted the power of speech, recognizing its ability to stir emotions, cause pain, and provoke action. Despite the potential harm, the court emphasized the importance of protecting hurtful speech to avoid stifling public debate. In contrast, the Terminello v. City of Chicago case from 1949 emphasized that free speech's role in society is to provoke dissent and unrest, even if it leads to anger. Both cases demonstrate the court's commitment to prioritizing liberty over the security concerns that may arise from regulating intense or controversial speech.
00:00
Transcript
Play full episode
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
