The interpretation of meanings is strongly influenced by cultural context. Statistical models may track behaviors for a while, but situations influenced by cultural beliefs can disprove theories. Impersonal mechanistic explanations in economics overlook the importance of people's meanings, stories, and self-interpretations, which are crucial in understanding human behavior. Trying to mimic natural sciences by relying solely on impersonal conditions in economics is a critical mistake as humans are cultural animals, and this approach is bound to fail eventually.
In this episode, we chat with Jason Blakely, an associate professor of political science, discussing a range of topics related to political science, ideology, and the role of science in society. Jason critiques the approach of treating social sciences like natural sciences, highlighting the limitations and misinterpretations this can lead to. The discussion also delves into the concept of "Psi-ops" in social sciences, the influence of cultural and narrative elements in understanding social phenomena, and the distinction between natural and social sciences. The conversation critically examines the current ideological and cultural frameworks in society, emphasizing the importance of storytelling and interpretation in understanding human behaviour and social dynamics.
Enjoy! x